Understanding the Dangers of Mind Changes in Political Leadership (and How to Avoid Them)

Social Theory and Practice 49 (4):653-679 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Political leaders may change their mind about a policy, or even a significant moral issue. While genuinely changing one’s mind is not hypocritical, there are reasons to think that leaders who claim such a change are merely hypocritically pandering for political advantage. Indeed, some social science studies allegedly confirm that constituents will judge political leaders who change positions as hypocritical. Yet these studies are missing crucial details that we normally use to distinguish genuine mind changers from hollow hypocrites. These details suggest ways in which political leaders can communicate that their mind change is genuine without necessarily being judged hypocritical.

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s “Certain Kind of Multitude”.Kevin M. Cherry - 2015 - Political Theory 43 (2):185-207.
Ariadne's Fears from Sea and Sky.Ariane Hewig - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (2):554-556.
The multiculturalism of fear.Jacob T. Levy - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2):271-283.
Solving the nuclear dilemma: Is a world state necessary?Campbell Craig - 2018 - Journal of International Political Theory 15 (3):349-366.
A parliament of souls.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Fascist Moment: Security, Exclusion, Extermination.Mark Neocleous - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (1):23-37.
Mystery and Politics.Corina Elke Goulden - 2002 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
The Philosophy of Authentic Leadership.Spencer Shaw - 2023 - Springer Nature Switzerland.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-26

Downloads
516 (#36,710)

6 months
299 (#7,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references