Paradoxes in the Argumentation of the Comic Double and Classemic Contradiction

Argumentation 17 (1):99-111 (2003)
In the comedies of errors, and more precisely in the comedies of double, in which two identities become confused, the characters get into paradoxical situations reigned by the principle of contradiction. The classemic relationships that are based on the criterion of subjectivity are broken due to the intervention of the character appearing as the double, for the doubled and the double can appear as one subject or as two. In fact, in the added double one + one equals one (1 + 1 = 1; Sosia + Mercury = Sosia) and in the split double one equals one + one (1 = 1 + 1; Philocomasium = Philocomasium + Dicea). In the modal oppositions of the alternative class (present | absent, to be | not to be) and in the aspectual oppositions of the sequential class (to arrive – to be in) the intrasubjective nature is cancelled; in the diathetic or complementary oppositions (to give .– to receive) the intersubjective relationship gets broken. Thus, it turns out that, due to the action of the double, a character can be present and absent at the same time, be and not be the same, be in a place before arriving there or have received what another has not yet given him
Keywords Ancient mythology  classemic relationships  contradiction  doubles  paradoxes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1022904025811
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,015
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2011 - National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
Double Prevention and Powers.Stephen Mumford & Rani Lill Anjum - 2009 - Journal of Critical Realism 8 (3):277-293.
Double Brain, Double Person?M. Thornton - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):761-763.
Who’s Afraid of Double Affection?Nicholas Stang - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15 (18).
A Double Dose of Double Effect.C. E. Kendall - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):204-205.
Double Appearances Are Double Trouble: Reply to Foster.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):195-196.
Self Betrayal.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:293-308.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #359,283 of 2,080,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #396,083 of 2,080,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums