Paradoxes in the Argumentation of the Comic Double and Classemic Contradiction

Argumentation 17 (1):99-111 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the comedies of errors, and more precisely in the comedies of double, in which two identities become confused, the characters get into paradoxical situations reigned by the principle of contradiction. The classemic relationships that are based on the criterion of subjectivity are broken due to the intervention of the character appearing as the double, for the doubled and the double can appear as one subject or as two. In fact, in the added double one + one equals one (1 + 1 = 1; Sosia + Mercury = Sosia) and in the split double one equals one + one (1 = 1 + 1; Philocomasium = Philocomasium + Dicea). In the modal oppositions of the alternative class (present | absent, to be | not to be) and in the aspectual oppositions of the sequential class (to arrive – to be in) the intrasubjective nature is cancelled; in the diathetic or complementary oppositions (to give .– to receive) the intersubjective relationship gets broken. Thus, it turns out that, due to the action of the double, a character can be present and absent at the same time, be and not be the same, be in a place before arriving there or have received what another has not yet given him

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Double prevention and powers.Stephen Mumford & Rani Anjum - 2009 - Journal of Critical Realism 8 (3):277-293.
Double brain, double person?M. Thornton - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):761-763.
Who’s Afraid of Double Affection?Nicholas Stang - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
A double dose of double effect.C. E. Kendall - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):204-205.
Double appearances are double trouble: Reply to Foster.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):195-196.
Self Betrayal.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:293-308.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
44 (#360,396)

6 months
9 (#304,685)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Descartes y Plauto. La conceptión dramática del sistema cartesiano.Benjamín García-hernández - 1998 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 188 (2):232-233.

Add more references