- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Can an Armchair Philosopher Do For a “Dirty-Hands” Engineer?
Axiomathes 22 (3):385-401 (2012)
Abstract
The paper relates the basic ontological categories defined by Roman Ingarden to an engineering model of function known by the name of Functional Basis. The intended aim of this exercise in applied philosophy is to make this model more consistent and outline some possible extensions thereofAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
What is an Artefact Design?Pawel Garbacz - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):137-149.
What is an Artefact Design?Pawel Garbacz - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):137-149.
Functions in Basic Formal Ontology.Andrew D. Spear, Werner Ceusters & Barry Smith - 2016 - Applied ontology 11 (2):103-128.
An ontological model of device function: industrial deployment and lessons learned.Yoshinobu Kitamura, Yusuke Koji & Riichiro Mizoguchi - 2006 - Applied ontology 1 (3):237-262.
Toward a Model of Functional Brain Processes II: Central Nervous System Functional Macro-architecture.Mark H. Bickhard - 2015 - Axiomathes 25 (4):377-407.
Structure and Coherence of Two-Model-Descriptions of Technical Artefacts.Ulrich Krohs - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (2):150-161.
Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like.von Wachter Daniel - 2005 - In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, culture, and persons: the ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: Ontos.
How Is Critical Ontology Possible? Toward the Foundation of the General Theory of the Categories, Part One (1923).Nicolai Hartmann & Keith R. Peterson - 2012 - Axiomathes 22 (3):315-354.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-01
Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)
6 months
73 (#72,590)
2011-01-01
Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)
6 months
73 (#72,590)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Engineering differences between natural, social, and artificial kinds.Eric T. Kerr - 2013 - In Maarten Franssen, Peter Kroes, Pieter Vermaas & Thomas A. C. Reydon (eds.), Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-made World. Cham: Synthese Library.
References found in this work
Ingarden and the ontology of cultural objects.Amie Thomasson - 2005 - In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, culture, and persons: the ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: Ontos. pp. 115-136.
Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Band 1: Existentialontologie.Roman Ingarden - 1964 - De Gruyter.
Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like.Daniel von Wachter - 2005 - In Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos Verlag. pp. 55-82.
Existence, culture, and persons: the ontology of Roman Ingarden.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (ed.) - 2005 - Frankfurt: Ontos.
Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like.von Wachter Daniel - 2005 - In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, culture, and persons: the ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: Ontos.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo