L’esthétique Brentanienne Comme Science Normative

Studia Phaenomenologica 4 (1):31-51 (2002)

Abstract

According to Brentano, logic, ethics and aesthetics are practical normative sciences, and they correspond to the three classes of psychic phenomena. But if a judgment or a love may be correct or incorrect, it seems more difficult to speak of a correct representation as this class of phenomena ignores a polarity such as right / wrong or good / bad. Brentano speaks nevertheless from the aesthetical “value” of representations. Aesthetics could in this way be considered as part of a general theory of value; but compared to ethics the specificity of this science tends to vanish. Another way to consider the question is to remember that the distinction among the three classes of psychic phenomena is only formal. It means that one has to question more precisely the very nature of representation and especially its relation to feeling.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
261 (#43,351)

6 months
1 (#386,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Quelle naturalisation de l'esthétique du cinéma ?Hugo Clemot - 2015 - Nouvelle Revue d'Esthétique 15:111-119.
Esthétique et sémiologie.Guy Bouchard - 1974 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 30 (1):63.
Schleiermacher: l'esthétique et la critique de Schelling.Morgan Gaulin - 2007 - Revue de Théologie Et de Philosophie 139 (1):22-36.