KK is Wrong Because We Say So

&
Mind (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

KK is wrong because we say so.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Interrogating the Linguistic Argument for KK.Cal Fawell - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy.
Could KK Be OK?Daniel Greco - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (4):169-197.
Assertion and the “How do you know?” challenge.Eliran Haziza - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-17.
Williamson, closure, and KK.Daniel Immerman - 2020 - Synthese 197 (8):3349-3373.
Abominable KK Failures.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (512):1227-1259.
Transparency and the KK Principle.Nilanjan Das & Bernhard Salow - 2018 - Noûs 52 (1):3-23.
The Self-Knowledge Gambit.Berislav Marušić - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):1977-1999.
Effective Skeptical Arguments.Christopher T. Buford & Anthony Brueckner - 2015 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 5 (1):55-60.
The Information-Theoretic Account of Knowledge, Closure and the KK Thesis.James Mattingly - 2022 - Disputatio 14 (65):105-132.
Knowledge-to-Fact Arguments (Bootstrapping, Closure, Paradox and KK).Murali Ramachandran - 2016 - Analysis 76 (2):142-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-01

Downloads
541 (#41,946)

6 months
541 (#2,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

John Hawthorne
University of Southern California
Simon Goldstein
University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references