- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Normative theory in decision making and moral reasoning
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):256-257 (2011)
Abstract
Normative theories can be useful in developing descriptive theories, as when normative subjective expected utility theory is used to develop descriptive rational choice theory and behavioral game theory. questions are also the essence of theories of moral reasoning, a domain of higher mental processing that could not survive without normative considerationsAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary/Elqayam & Evans: Subtracting “ought” from “is”.Natalie Gold, Andrew M. Colman & Briony D. Pulford - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5).
Neurath's ship: The constitutive relation between normative and descriptive theories of rationality.Michael R. Waldmann - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):273-274.
Decision-Making Theories and Models: A Discussion of Rational and Psychological Decision-Making Theories and Models: The Search for a Cultural-Ethical Decision-Making Model.Arnaldo Oliveira - 2007 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 12 (2):12-17.
Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theories. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (2):139-199.
On is an ought: Levels of analysis and the descriptive versus normative analysis of human reasoning.Walter Schroyens - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):101-102.
Locally rational decision-making.Richard M. Shiffrin - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):175-175.
“Internal” Problems of Normative Theories of Thinking and Reasoning.Piotr Urbańczyk - 2016 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 60:35-52.
Why rational norms are indispensable.Ulrike Hahn - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):257-258.
Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.Shira Elqayam & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):233-248.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)
6 months
53 (#90,063)
2013-10-27
Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)
6 months
53 (#90,063)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.Philippa Foot - 1967 - Oxford Review 5:5-15.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo