Why Leibniz Was Not an Eclectic Philosopher?

In Wenchao Li (ed.), Für unser Glück oder das Glück anderer (=Keynotes of the Xth International Leibniz-Congress). Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: Olms. pp. 153-174 (2017)

Ursula Goldenbaum
Emory University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,984
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Antecedents of Leibniz’s Principles.Martinho Antônio Bittencourt de Castro - 2008 - Dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia
Leibnizian Deliberation.Samuel Murray - 2017 - Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (2):120-138.
Leibniz Über Toleranz Und Wahrheit.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - In Erich Barke, Rolf Wernstedt & Herbert Breger (eds.), Leibniz Neu Denken. F. Steiner.
Necessitarianism in Leibniz's Confessio Philosophi.Joseph Anderson - 2012 - Society and Politics 6 (2):114-123.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature