Ex aequali Ratios in the Greek and Arabic Euclidean Traditions

Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 6 (2):167 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Euclid discusses the ex aequali relationship twice in the Elements. The first is in Book V, during his discussion of arithmetical relations between mathematical magnitudes in general. The second is in Books VIIIX, he was not much troubled by the differences between his treatment of ex aequali ratios in these two contexts. Later generations of mathematicians, however, found these differences less acceptable and tried to minimize them in various ways. This paper summarizes Euclid's use of the ex aequali relation in developing his mathematics. The paper then outlines the fate of the post-Theonine Greek attempts to the Euclidean discussion when the Elements entered the Arabic/Islamic intellectual tradition. The study concludes with the attempts by Ibn al-Hayam and Ibn al-Sarī to improve the parallelism between the discussions of ex aequali ratios in Book V and Book VII

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ex aequali Ratios in the Greek and Arabic Euclidean Traditions.Gregg Young - 1996 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 6 (2):167-213.
The knowledge of arabic mathematics by clavius.Eberhard Knobloch - 2002 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2):257-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
14 (#264,824)

6 months
46 (#334,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure of Euclid 's "Elements".Ian Mueller - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (1):57-70.
Simplicius's proof of euclid's parallels postulate.A. I. Sabra - 1969 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 32 (1):1-24.

Add more references