Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe [Book Review]

&
Minerva 44 (2):167-184 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whilst public engagement in decisions concerning science and technology is widely extolled, research shows that the application of deliberative democratic theory remains – at least in Europe – highly constrained. Science and technology policy requires closer attention to the wider context of governance and the compatibility of public deliberation with established modes of policy-making

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Intrinsic Value of Public Deliberation in the Governance of Human Genome Editing.Kalina Kamenova - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):63-65.
Editorial Overview: Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom?Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Beginning Science Policy Research in Europe: The Studiengruppe für Systemforschung, 1957–1973. [REVIEW]Helmut Krauch - 2006 - Minerva 44 (2):131-142.
Avoiding empty rhetoric: Engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Editorial Overview.Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.Ine Van Hoyweghen, Jessica Mesman, David Townend & Laurens Landeweerd - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1).
Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.Ine Hoyweghen, Jessica Mesman, David Townend & Laurens Landeweerd - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-22.
A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology.Silke Beck, Roger Pielke & Eva Lövbrand - 2011 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 36 (4):474-496.
Challenges to public engagement in science and technology in Japan: experiences in the HapMap Project.Eiko Suda, Darryl Macer & Ichiro Matsuda - 2009 - Genomics, Society and Policy 5 (1):1-20.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary on: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)

6 months
35 (#103,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness.Pak-Hang Wong - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):225-244.
The Paradox of Participation Experiments.Alexander Bogner - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (5):506-527.
Scientific Pluralism.Ludwig David & Ruphy Stéphanie - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What makes neuroethics possible?Fernando Vidal - 2019 - History of the Human Sciences 32 (2):32-58.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references