With infinite utility, more needn't be better

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):231 – 240 (2000)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstract
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048400012349511
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Infinite Value and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Nevin Climenhaga - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Utility Monsters for the Fission Age.Rachael Briggs & Daniel Nolan - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2):392-407.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Utility and Framing.Paul Weirich - 2010 - Synthese 176 (1):83 - 103.
Perspectives on a Pair of Envelopes.Piers Rawling - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):253-277.
Infinite Utility: Anonymity and Person-Centredness.Peter Vallentyne - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):413 – 420.
Infinite Utilitarianism: More is Always Better.Luc Lauwers & Peter Vallentyne - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):307-330.
Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.Peter Vallentyne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
38 ( #140,670 of 2,199,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,471 of 2,199,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature