With infinite utility, more needn't be better

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):231 – 240 (2000)

Authors
Joel David Hamkins
Oxford University
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstract
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048400012349511
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Infinite Value and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Nevin Climenhaga - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research:367-392.
Utility Monsters for the Fission Age.Rachael Briggs & Daniel Nolan - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2):392-407.
Infinite Ethics.Nick Bostrom - 2011 - Analysis and Metaphysics 10:9-59.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Utility and Framing.Paul Weirich - 2010 - Synthese 176 (1):83 - 103.
Infinite Utilitarianism: More is Always Better.Luc Lauwers & Peter Vallentyne - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):307-330.
Infinite Utility: Anonymity and Person-Centredness.Peter Vallentyne - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):413 – 420.
Perspectives on a Pair of Envelopes.Piers Rawling - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):253-277.
Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.Peter Vallentyne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
59 ( #148,965 of 2,285,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #199,094 of 2,285,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature