A defense of branching quantification

Synthese 95 (3):419 - 432 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Adding branching quantification to a first-order language increases the expressive power of the language,without adding to its ontology. The present paper is a defense of this claim against Quine (1970) and Patton (1991).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#1,222,590)

6 months
73 (#72,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Hand
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Names.Sam Cumming - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Is Hintikka's Logic First-Order?Matti Eklund & Daniel Kolak - 2002 - Synthese 131 (3):371-388.
Informational variability.Michael Hand - 1994 - Synthese 99 (3):417 - 456.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons.
Philosophy of Logic.W. V. Quine - 2005-01-01 - In José Medina & David Wood (eds.), Truth. Blackwell.
On branching quantifiers in English.Jon Barwise - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):47 - 80.
Finite partially-ordered quantification.Wilbur John Walkoe Jr - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):535-555.
Finite partially-ordered quantification.Wilbur John Walkoe - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):535-555.

View all 11 references / Add more references