Misrepresenting Neoplatonism in Contemporary Christian Dionysian Polemic: Eriugena and Nicholas of Cusa versus Vladimir Lossky and Jean-Luc Marion

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (4):683-703 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper contrasts the reception of Dionysius in relation to non-Christian philosophy during the Latin Middle Ages with his reception in twentieth-centuryChristian thought. The medievals, including Eriugena, Thomas Aquinas, Nicholas of Cusa, and many others, as a rule refuse to divide religion from philosophy and they distinguish or unite thinkers by their teaching rather than by their confessional adherence. Hence they see no need to set Dionysius in opposition to non-Christian philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, and Proclus, or to repudiate the latter in favor of the former. By contrast, Vladimir Lossky and Jean-Luc Marion, with their shared background in Etienne Gilson, celebrate Dionysius in opposition to the non-Christian Neoplatonists, whom they polemically misrepresent as reducing God to conceptual categories. These twentieth-century figures evince a sectarian religious narrowness that blinds them to the textual and philosophical community of Dionysius with his non-Christian sources.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pantheism from John Scottus Eriugena to Nicholas of Cusa in Nicholas of Cusa.Dermot Moran - 1990 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (1):131-152.
Pseudo-dionysius the areopagite.Mark Lamarre - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
God Without Being: Hors Texte.Jean-Luc Marion - 1991 - University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
63 (#191,281)

6 months
2 (#300,644)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references