Competing Claims and the Separateness of Persons

Philosophical Papers 51 (1):89-113 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the use of the separateness of persons in the debate between the priority view and the competing claims view is deeply flawed. In making the case, I argue for three points. First, that...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-24

Downloads
30 (#550,897)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jamie Hardy
University of Utah

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (1):96-99.
Equality or Priority?Derek Parfit - 2002 - In Matthew Clayton & Andrew Williams (eds.), The Ideal of Equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 81-125.

View all 18 references / Add more references