Sunstein's heuristics provide insufficient descriptive and explanatory adequacy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):553-554 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In considering a domain of knowledge – language, music, mathematics, or morality – it is necessary to derive principles that can describe the mature state and explain how an individual reaches this state. Although Sunstein's heuristics go some way toward a description of our moral sense, it is not clear that they are at the right level of description, and as stated, they provide no guidelines for looking at the acquisition process – the problem of explanatory adequacy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regulation of risks.Paul Weirich - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):564-565.
Moral heuristics and the means/end distinction.Barbara H. Fried - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):549-550.
Moral judgments in narrative contexts.Richard J. Gerrig - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):550-550.
Towards an intuitionist account of moral development.Karen Bartsch & Jennifer Cole Wright - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):546-547.
Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
How do narratives relate to heuristics?Gerd Gigerenzer - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e94.
Moral heuristics or moral competence? Reflections on Sunstein.John Mikhail - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):557-558.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#132,620)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references