Argumentation 12 (1):15-37 (1998)
In many actual arguments, the conclusion seems intuitively to follow from the premisses, even though we cannot show that it follows logically. The traditional approach to evaluating such arguments is to suppose that they have an unstated premiss whose explicit addition will produce an argument where the conclusion does follow logically. But there are good reasons for doubting that people so frequently leave the premisses of their arguments unstated. The inclination to suppose that they do stems from the belief that the only way in which an argument's conclusion can follow definitely from its premisses is to follow logically. I argue that this belief is mistaken. I propose a revision of the current generic conception of logical consequence, and its variant specifications, to avoid the paradoxes of strict implication. The revised conception can then be naturally extended to include also what we might call 'enthymematic consequence'. This concept is a kind of consequence, whose properties merit investigation
|Keywords||enthymeme unstated premiss consequence logical consequence enthy-mematic consequence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Strict Conditionals: A Negative Result.Jan Heylen & Leon Horsten - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):536–549.
Educational Background, Modes of Discourse and Argumentation: Comparing Women and Men. [REVIEW]M. Jesús Cala Carrillo & Manuel L. De La Mata Benítez Maria - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):403-426.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle on a Puzzle About Logical Consequence: Necessity of Being Vs. Necessity of Saying.Paolo Fait - 2004 - Topoi 23 (1):101-112.
On the Concept of Material Consequence.Tomis Kapitan - 1982 - History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):193-211.
Perfect Validity, Entailment and Paraconsistency.Neil Tennant - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):181 - 200.
The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Philippe Mongin - 2010 - Journal of Economic Theory 145 (2):562-582.
A Completeness Theorem for Unrestricted First-Order Languages.Agustín Rayo & Timothy Williamson - 2003 - In Jc Beall (ed.), Liars and Heaps. Oxford University Press.
The Paradoxical Associated Conditional of Enthymemes.Gilbert Plumer - 2000 - In Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen & Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding. [REVIEW]Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):127-139.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads10 ( #435,665 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,172 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?