Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):143-159 (1990)
AbstractPhilosophical ethics comprises metaethics, normative ethics and applied ethics. These have characteristically received analytic treatment by twentieth-century Anglo-American philosophy. But there has been disagreement over their interrelationship to one another and the relationship of analytical ethics to substantive morality – the making of moral judgments. I contend that the expertise philosophers have in either theoretical or applied ethics does not equip them to make sounder moral judgments on the problems of bioethics than nonphilosophers. One cannot "apply" theories like Kantianism or consequentialism to get solutions to practical moral problems unless one knows which theory is correct, and that is a metaethical question over which there is no consensus. On the other hand, to presume to be able to reach solutions through neutral analysis of problems is unavoidably to beg controversial theoretical issues in the process. Thus, while analytical ethics can play an important clarificatory role in bioethics, it can neither provide, nor substitute for, moral wisdom. Keywords: abortion, applied ethics, bioethics, metaethics, normative ethics CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
Similar books and articles
Applied Ethics and Social Problems: Moral Questions of Birth, Society and Death.Tony Fitzpatrick - 2008 - Policy Press.
Method in Bioethics: A Troubled Assessment.Ronald M. Green - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):179-197.
Methodological Concerns in Bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Observations on the Epistemological Status of Bioethics.Massimo Reichlin - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):79-102.
Possibilities of Consensus: Toward Democratic Moral Discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Policy Arguments in a Public Church: Catholic Social Ethics and Bioethics.J. Bryan Hehir - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):347-364.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Normative Ethics Does Not Need a Foundation: It Needs More Science.Katinka Quintelier, Linda Van Speybroeck & Johan Braeckman - 2010 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (1):29-51.
Bioethics as a Second-Order Discipline: Who is Not a Bioethicist?Loretta Kopelman - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):601 – 628.
Considering Virtue: Public Health and Clinical Ethics.Karen M. Meagher - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):888-893.
References found in this work
Public Ethics and Policy Making.Albert R. Jonsen & Lewis H. Butler - 1975 - Hastings Center Report 5 (4):19-31.