The limited relevance of analytical ethics to the problems of bioethics

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):143-159 (1990)
Abstract
Philosophical ethics comprises metaethics, normative ethics and applied ethics. These have characteristically received analytic treatment by twentieth-century Anglo-American philosophy. But there has been disagreement over their interrelationship to one another and the relationship of analytical ethics to substantive morality – the making of moral judgments. I contend that the expertise philosophers have in either theoretical or applied ethics does not equip them to make sounder moral judgments on the problems of bioethics than nonphilosophers. One cannot "apply" theories like Kantianism or consequentialism to get solutions to practical moral problems unless one knows which theory is correct, and that is a metaethical question over which there is no consensus. On the other hand, to presume to be able to reach solutions through neutral analysis of problems is unavoidably to beg controversial theoretical issues in the process. Thus, while analytical ethics can play an important clarificatory role in bioethics, it can neither provide, nor substitute for, moral wisdom. Keywords: abortion, applied ethics, bioethics, metaethics, normative ethics CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/15.2.143
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,106
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Considering Virtue: Public Health and Clinical Ethics.Karen M. Meagher - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):888-893.
Designing Ethicists.Michael C. Brannigan - 1996 - Health Care Analysis 4 (3):206-218.
Everything is What It Is.Carl Elliott - 1991 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):525-538.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Ethical Cycle.I. Van De Poel & L. Royakkers - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1 - 13.
The Ethical Cycle.I. van de Poel & L. Royakkers - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1-13.
Policy Arguments in a Public Church: Catholic Social Ethics and Bioethics.J. Bryan Hehir - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):347-364.
Possibilities of Consensus: Toward Democratic Moral Discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Observations on the Epistemological Status of Bioethics.Massimo Reichlin - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):79-102.
Methodological Concerns in Bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Method in Bioethics: A Troubled Assessment.Ronald M. Green - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):179-197.
Medical Ethics: Problems of Theory and Practice.Raisa Vasil'evna Korotkikh - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):269-282.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-19

Total downloads

17 ( #284,882 of 2,171,709 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,709 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums