Can Individual Movement Characteristics Across Different Throwing Disciplines Be Identified in High-Performance Decathletes?

Frontiers in Psychology 11:561870 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the individuality of whole-body movements has been suspected for years, the scientific proof and systematic investigation that individuals possess unique movement patterns did not manifest until the introduction of the criteria of uniqueness and persistence from the field of forensic science. Applying the criteria of uniqueness and persistence to the individuality of motor learning processes requires complex strategies due to the problem of persistence in the learning processes. One approach is to examine the learning process of different movements. For this purpose, it is necessary to differentiate between two components of movement patterns: the individual-specific component and the discipline-specific component. To this end, a kinematic analysis of the shot put, discus, and javelin throwing movements of seven high-performance decathletes during a qualification competition was conducted. In total, joint angle waveforms of 57 throws formed the basis for the recognition task of individual- and discipline-specific throwing patterns using a support vector machine. The results reveal that the kinematic throwing patterns of the three disciplines could be distinguished across athletes with a prediction accuracy of up to 100% (57 of 57 throws). However, athlete-specific throwing characteristics could also be identified across the three disciplines. Prediction accuracies of up to 52.6% indicated that up to 10 out of 19 throws of a discipline could be assigned to the correct athletes, based on only knowing these athletes from the kinematic throwing patterns in the other two disciplines. The results further suggest that individual throwing characteristics across disciplines are more pronounced in shot put and discus throwing than in javelin throwing. Applications for training and learning practice in sports and therapy are discussed. In summary, the chosen approach offers a broad field of application related to the search of individually optimal movement solutions in sports.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Overdetermining causes.Jonathan Schaffer - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):23 - 45.
If I want to perform better, then how should I feel?Andrew M. Lane - 2013 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 44 (2):130-136.
Sound Design: A Phenomenology.Christopher Wenn - 2019 - In Stuart Grant, Jodie McNeilly-Renaudie & Matthew Wagner (eds.), Performance Phenomenology: To the Thing Itself. Springer Verlag. pp. 261-285.
Visual control of target-directed movements.Romeo Chua & Digby Elliott - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):304-306.
Philosophy, Literature, and Ethics: Let the Engagement Begin.K. D. Clouser - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (3):321-340.
Gadamer and the Hermeneutics of Early Music Performance.Mark J. Thomas - 2018 - Research in Phenomenology 48 (3):365-384.
The bioethics of enhancing human performance for spaceflight.T. M. Gibson - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):129-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-18

Downloads
7 (#1,387,520)

6 months
1 (#1,471,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?