Underivative duty: Prichard on moral obligation: Thomas Hurka

Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):111-134 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines H.A. Prichard's defense of the view that moral duty is underivative, as reflected in his argument that it is a mistake to ask “Why ought I to do what I morally ought?”, because the only possible answer is “Because you morally ought to.” This view was shared by other philosophers of Prichard's period, from Henry Sidgwick through A.C. Ewing, but Prichard stated it most forcefully and defended it best. The paper distinguishes three stages in Prichard's argument: one appealing to his conceptual minimalism, one an epistemological argument that parallels Moore's response to skepticism about the external world, and one arguing that attempts to justify moral duties on non-moral grounds distort the phenomena by giving those duties the wrong explanation or ground. The paper concludes by considering Prichard's critique of ancient ethics and in particular the ethics of Aristotle. The paper is broadly sympathetic to Prichard's position and arguments; its aim is partly to make a case for him as a central figure in the history of ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

H. A. Prichard's Moral Epistemology.William Joseph O'Brien - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
Moral Writings.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Writings.H. A. Prichard and Jim MacAdam - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
Prichard Vs. Plato: Intuition Vs. Reflection.Mark Lebar - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (5):pp. 1-32.
El Intuicionismo de Prichard.Mauricio Rengifo Gardeazábal - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (127):35-53.
Moral Writings.Jim MacAdam (ed.) - 2002 - Clarendon Press.
Moral Action, Ignorance of Fact, and Inability.Daniel Kading - 1965 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (3):333-355.
Moral Obligation.Harold Arthur Prichard - 1949 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-17

Downloads
83 (#145,420)

6 months
3 (#210,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Hurka
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

The Decline of Egoism.Robert Shaver - 2022 - Utilitas 34 (3):300-316.
The Wrongfulness Constraint in Criminalisation.Antje Bois-Pedain - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):149-169.
Prichard's Heresy.Sandy Berkovski - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (4):503-524.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations