Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):111-134 (2010)

Thomas Hurka
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
This paper examines H.A. Prichard's defense of the view that moral duty is underivative, as reflected in his argument that it is a mistake to ask “Why ought I to do what I morally ought?”, because the only possible answer is “Because you morally ought to.” This view was shared by other philosophers of Prichard's period, from Henry Sidgwick through A.C. Ewing, but Prichard stated it most forcefully and defended it best. The paper distinguishes three stages in Prichard's argument: one appealing to his conceptual minimalism, one an epistemological argument that parallels Moore's response to skepticism about the external world, and one arguing that attempts to justify moral duties on non-moral grounds distort the phenomena by giving those duties the wrong explanation or ground. The paper concludes by considering Prichard's critique of ancient ethics and in particular the ethics of Aristotle. The paper is broadly sympathetic to Prichard's position and arguments; its aim is partly to make a case for him as a central figure in the history of ethics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052509990173
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,421
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Harvard University Press.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1871 - Thoemmes Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Wrongfulness Constraint in Criminalisation.Antje Bois-Pedain - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):149-169.
Prichard's Heresy.Sandy Berkovski - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (4):503-524.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

H. A. Prichard's Moral Epistemology.William Joseph O'Brien - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
Moral Writings.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Writings.H. A. Prichard and Jim MacAdam - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
Prichard Vs. Plato: Intuition Vs. Reflection.Mark Lebar - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (5):pp. 1-32.
El Intuicionismo de Prichard.Mauricio Rengifo Gardeazábal - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (127):35-53.
Moral Writings.Jim MacAdam (ed.) - 2002 - Clarendon Press.
Moral Action, Ignorance of Fact, and Inability.Daniel Kading - 1965 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (3):333-355.
Moral Obligation.Harold Arthur Prichard - 1949 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
79 ( #136,007 of 2,449,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes