Emotion Review 4 (1):66-67 (2012)

Authors
Daniel D. Hutto
University of Wollongong
Abstract
This comment on Stueber’s article clarifies the nature of the core disagreement between his approach to understanding reasons and mine. The purely philosophical nature of the dispute is highlighted. It is argued that understanding someone’s narrative often suffices for understanding the person’s reasons in ordinary cases. It is observed that Stueber has yet to provide a compelling counter case. There is also a brief clarification of some of the empirical commitments of the narrative practice hypothesis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073911421384
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,792
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-01

Total views
51 ( #185,416 of 2,341,549 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,645 of 2,341,549 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes