Foundations of Science 7 (4):453-463 (2002)
A modern assessment of the classical Boltzmann-Schuetz argument for large-scale entropy fluctuations as the origin of our observable cosmological domain is given.The emphasis is put on the central implication of this picture which flatly contradicts the weak anthropic principle as an epistemological statement about the universe. Therefore, to associate this picture with the anthropic principle as it is usually done is unwarranted. In particular, Feynman's criticism of theanthropic principle based on the entropy-fluctuation picture is a product of this semantic confusion.
|Keywords||arrow of time anthropic principle entropy philosophy of cosmology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Carter on Anthropic Principle Predictions.Patrick A. Wilson - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):241-253.
The Thermodynamical Arrow of Time: Reinterpreting the Boltzmann–Schuetz Argument. [REVIEW]Milan Cirkovic - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (3):467-490.
Cosmos and Theos: Ethical and Theological Implications of the Anthropic Cosmological Principle.Errol E. Harris - 1992 - Humanities Press.
Cosmos and Anthropos: A Philosophical Interpretation of the Anthropic Cosmological Principle.E. Harris Errol - 1991 - Humanity Books.
The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for Philosophers.Frank J. Tipler - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:27 - 48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads195 ( #21,635 of 2,163,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,270 of 2,163,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?