Popper's piecemeal engineering: What is good for science is not always good for society

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):1-10 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Principles and Policies.Harald Stelzer - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (4):375-391.
Economism, freedom, and “the epistemology and politics of ignorance”: Reply to Friedman.Mark Amadeus Notturno - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):431-452.
Science and technology for the good of society?Stephanie J. Bird - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):3-4.
What makes a 'good' experiment?Allan Franklin - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (4):367-374.
Errata and corrigenda for good and good.I. J. Good - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (49):88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#166,159)

6 months
11 (#271,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gurol Irzik
Sabanci University

Citations of this work

Re-echoing the Conservatism in Karl Popper’s Piecemeal Engineering.Oseni Taiwo Afisi - 2020 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 15 (1):9-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The poverty of historicism.Karl Raimund Popper - 1957 - London,: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
The Poverty of Historicism.Karl R. Popper - 1957 - London,: Routledge.
The Poverty of Historicism.Karl R. Popper - 1957 - London,: Routledge.
Popper, historicism, and the remaking of society.P. D. Shaw - 1971 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1 (2):299-308.

Add more references