- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Turing—Good Weight of Evidence Function and Popper's Measure of the Severity of a Test
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):143-146 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Donald Gillies: An Objective Theory of Probability. [REVIEW]David Miller - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):292-295.
Review of Donald Gillies: Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Uebel - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1066-1069.
Popper’s Measure of Corroboration and P.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs029.
Review. Artificial intelligence and scientific method. Donald Gillies. Philosophy and AI: essays at the interface. Robert Cummins, John Pollock (eds). [REVIEW]John Preston - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):610-612.
Review of Donald Gillies: Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Method_; Robert Cummins and John L. Pollock: _Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface. [REVIEW]John Preston - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):610-612.
Transcendence: Measuring Intelligence.Marten Kaas - 2023 - Journal of Science Fiction and Philosophy 6.
Popper's piecemeal engineering: What is good for science is not always good for society.Gürol Irzik - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):1-10.
Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes by Donald Gillies. [REVIEW]Alan Chalmers - 1994 - Isis 85:744-744.
Donald Gillies: Laws and Models in Science. [REVIEW]Donata Romizi - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):427-432.
Imprecise Probability and the Measurement of Keynes's "Weight of Arguments".William Peden - 2018 - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 5 (4):677-708.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
130 (#144,570)
6 months
24 (#121,642)
2009-01-28
Downloads
130 (#144,570)
6 months
24 (#121,642)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On argument strength.Niki Pfeifer - 2013 - In Frank Zenker (ed.), Bayesian argumentation. The practical side of probability. Dordrecht, Netherlands: pp. 185-193.
Two Conceptions of Weight of Evidence in Peirce’s Illustrations of the Logic of Science.Jeff Kasser - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (3):629-648.
Probabilistic support, probabilistic induction and bayesian confirmation theory.Andres Rivadulla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):477-483.
The frame problem: An AI fairy tale. [REVIEW]Kevin B. Korb - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):317-351.
References found in this work
Logical Foundations of Probability.Ernest H. Hutten - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):205-207.
Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications.Irving John Good - 1983 - Univ Minnesota Pr.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo