David Stump. Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the A Priori. New York: Routledge, 2015. Pp. 176. $116.00 [Book Review]

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1):151-153 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A priori and the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Tatiana Sokolova - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):225-231.
Arthur Pap’s Functional Theory of the A Priori.David J. Stump - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):273-290.
Pierre Duhem’s epistemic aims and the intellectual virtue of humility: a reply to Ivanova.Ian James Kidd - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):185-189.
Defending conventions as functionally a priori knowledge.David J. Stump - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1149-1160.
Stumping For Widerker.Stewart Goetz - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):83-89.
Sellars, concepts, and conceptual change.Harold I. Brown - 1986 - Synthese 68 (August):275-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-15

Downloads
38 (#365,484)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Milena Ivanova
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references