Challenges and Opportunities of Lifelog Technologies: A Literature Review and Critical Analysis

Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):379-409 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a lifelog, data from various sources are combined to form a record from which one can retrieve information about oneself and the environment in which one is situated. It could be considered similar to an automated biography. Lifelog technology is still at an early stage of development. However, the history of lifelogs so far shows a clear academic, corporate and governmental interest. Therefore, a thorough inquiry into the ethical aspects of lifelogs could prove beneficial to the responsible development of this field. This article maps the main ethically relevant challenges and opportunities associated with the further development of lifelog technologies as discussed in the scholarly literature. By identifying challenges and opportunities in the current debate, we were able to identify other challenges and opportunities left unmentioned. Some of these challenges are partly explained by a blind spot in the current debate. Whilst the current debate focuses mainly on lifelogs held by individuals, lifelogs held by governmental institutions and corporations pose idiosyncratic ethical concerns as well. We have provided a brief taxonomy of lifelog technology to show the variety in uses for lifelogs. In addition, we provided a general approach to alleviate the ethical challenges identified in the critical analysis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contemporary moral controversies in technology.A. Pablo Iannone (ed.) - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-09

Downloads
39 (#407,668)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bert Gordijn
Dublin City University
Tim Jacquemard
Dublin City University
Peter Novitzky
University College London