- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001)
Cognition 104 (2):417-426 (2007)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Re-evaluating evidence for lin-guistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001).J. David & K. Edward - 2006 - Cognition 7 (8).
Re-evaluating linguistic relativity: Language-specific categories and the role of universal ontological knowledge in the construal of individuation.Mutsumi Imai & Reiko Mazuka - 2003 - In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. MIT Press. pp. 429--464.
Review of Niemeier & Dirven (2000): Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. [REVIEW]Uwe Durst - 2003 - Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (2):379-386.
Evidence Against Linguistic Relativity in Chinese and English: A Case Study of Spatial and Temporal Metaphors.Chi-Shing Tse & Jeanette Altarriba - 2008 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 8 (3-4):335-357.
Introduction: Linguistic relativity re-examined.John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson - 1996 - In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--18.
Rethinking Linguistic Relativity.J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.) - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Is linguistic determinism an empirically testable hypothesis?Helen3 De Cruz - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):327-341.
Linguistic relativity: on hypotheses and confusions.Marion V. Smith - 1996 - Communication and Cognition. Monographies 29 (1):65-90.
Reply to David Gordon's Special Relativity and the Location of Mental Events.Michael Lockwood - 1984 - Analysis 44 (June):127-128.
Methodological problems in cross-cultural studies of linguistic relativity.Yohtaro Takano - 1989 - Cognition 31 (2):141-162.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
145 (#30,033)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
2014-01-20
Downloads
145 (#30,033)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?Lera Boroditsky, Orly Fuhrman & Kelly McCormick - 2011 - Cognition 118 (1):123-129.
How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D.Orly Fuhrman, Kelly McCormick, Eva Chen, Heidi Jiang, Dingfang Shu, Shuaimei Mao & Lera Boroditsky - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (7):1305-1328.
Verbal labels facilitate tactile perception.Tally McCormick Miller, Timo Torsten Schmidt, Felix Blankenburg & Friedemann Pulvermüller - 2018 - Cognition 171 (C):172-179.
Time will tell: Temporal landmarks influence metaphorical associations between space and time.Heng Li & Yu Cao - 2018 - Cognitive Linguistics 29 (4):677-701.
References found in this work
Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.Lera Boroditsky - 2000 - Cognition 75 (1):1-28.
Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning.Peggy Li & Lila Gleitman - 2002 - Cognition 83 (3):265-294.
The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized.Wim Gevers, Bert Reynvoet & Wim Fias - 2003 - Cognition 87 (3):B87-B95.
Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning.Stephen C. Levinson, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Björn H. Rasch - 2002 - Cognition 84 (2):155-188.
Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition.Anna Papafragou - 2002 - Cognition 84 (2):189-219.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo