European Public Deliberation on Brain Machine Interface Technology: Five Convergence Seminars [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1071-1086 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present a novel procedure to engage the public in ethical deliberations on the potential impacts of brain machine interface technology. We call this procedure a convergence seminar, a form of scenario-based group discussion that is founded on the idea of hypothetical retrospection. The theoretical background of this procedure and the results of five seminars are presented.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Crucial Considerations: Essays on the Ethics of Emerging Technologies.Karim Jebari - 2012 - Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Brain machine-interface technology in neurosurgery.Jeffrey Rosenfeld & Marike Broekman - 2020 - In Stephen Honeybul (ed.), Ethics in neurosurgical practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-22

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
81 (#65,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Karim Jebari
Institute for Futures Studies
Sven Ove Hansson
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

References found in this work

Stimulating brains, altering minds.W. Glannon - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):289-292.
Hypothetical Retrospection.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):145-157.
Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Emotions.Sabine Roeser - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):197-201.

Add more references