In Ronald Dworkin & Justine Burley (eds.), Journal of Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 218--240 (2004)

Frances Myrna Kamm
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
In the first part of this article, I raise questions about Dworkin's theory of the intrinsic value of life and about the adequacy of his proposal to understand abortion in terms of different ways of valuing life. In the second part of the article, I consider his argument in "The Philosophers' Brief on Assisted Suicide", which claims that the distinction between killing and letting die is morally irrelevant, the distinction between intending and foreseeing death can be morally relevant but is not always so. I argue that the killing/letting die distinction can be relevant in the context of assisted suicide, but also show when it is not. Then I consider why the intention/foresight distinction can be morally irrelevant and conclude by presenting an alternative argument for physician-assisted suicide
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Ethics   Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
DOI 10.1023/A:1012755208057
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Climate Matters for Future People.Paul Bou-Habib - 2016 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (1):143-157.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #260,275 of 2,462,339 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,321 of 2,462,339 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes