A paradox of definability: Richard'S and poincaré'S ways out

History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):33-44 (1994)
In 1905, Richard discovered his paradox of definability, and in a letter written that year he presented both the paradox and a solution to it.Soon afterwards, Poincaré endorsed a variant of Richard?s solution.In this paper, I critically examine Richard?s and Poincaré?s ways out.I draw on an objection of Peano?s, and argue that their stated solutions do not work.But I also claim that their writings suggest another way out, different from their stated solutions, and different from the orthodox Tarskian approach.I argue that this second solution does not prevent the return of the paradox
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445349408837223
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,831
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
From Frege to Gödel.Jean Van Heijenoort (ed.) - 1967 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Diagonal Argument and the Liar.Keith Simmons - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (3):277 - 303.
Logique.H. Poincaré - 1906 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 14:294-317.
Infini.H. Poincaré - 1909 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 17:461-482.
Les Principes des mathématiques et le problème des ensembles.Jules Richard - 1905 - Revue Générale des Sciences Pures Et Appliquées 12 (16):541-543.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Paradoxes of Denotation.Keith Simmons - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 76 (1):71 - 106.
Falling In and Out of Love with Philosophy.John Forrester - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):96-111.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Grelling's Paradox.Jay Newhard - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard DeWitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
The New Paradox of the Stone Revisited.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
On a Medieval Solution to the Liar Paradox.Keith Simmons - 1987 - History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):121-140.
This Proposition is Not True: C.S. Peirce and the Liar Paradox. Atkins - 2011 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (4):421-444.
Probabilistic Causality and Simpson's Paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
16 ( #331,926 of 2,214,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #134,663 of 2,214,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature