Response to papers for “ethnography, anthropology, and comparative religious ethics” focus

Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):485-493 (2010)

Abstract
The Center for the Study of World Religions (CSWR) project represented here through papers by Thomas Lewis, Aaron Stalnaker, Hans Lucht, and Lee Yearley (with responses) was motivated by the judgment that the trend toward a focus on virtue ethics, with attendant concern for techniques of forming selves, creates an opportunity for a dialogue with ethnographers. I argue that the CSWR essays neglect social and institutional considerations, as well as overdrawing the distinction between “formalist” and virtue approaches to the study of comparative ethics
Keywords Lewis  Mahmood  Lucht  comparative ethics  Stalnaker  Prasad  Yearley
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00442.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,330
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers.Richard Rorty - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Rhetoric Of Context.Jung H. Lee - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):555-584.
Response to Bucar and Stalnaker.John Kelsay - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):564-570.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-19

Total views
19 ( #437,373 of 2,254,902 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,009,469 of 2,254,902 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature