The Relationship between Humean Chance and Principal Principle: A Reply to Hall’s Critique against Lewis’ Best System Approach to Chance

Journal of the Society of Philosophical Studies 61:271-306 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chance, credence, and the principal principle.Robert Black - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):371-385.
On what we know about chance.Frank Arntzenius & Ned Hall - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):171-179.
Humean Supervenience Rebugged.Suki Finn - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):959-970.
Chance, credence, and the principle.Robert Black - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):371-385.
Justifying Lewis’s Kinematics of Chance.Patryk Dziurosz-Serafinowicz - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):439-463.
Two mistakes about credence and chance.Ned Hall - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):93 – 111.
Principled chances.Jonathan Schaffer - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):27-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
9 (#1,254,017)

6 months
7 (#430,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references