So … who is your audience?


Authors
Philip Kitcher
Columbia University
Abstract
To whom, if anyone, are the writings of philosophers of science relevant? There are three potential groups of people: Philosophers, Scientists, and Interested Citizens, within and beyond the academy. I argue that our discipline is potentially relevant to all three, but I particularly press the claims of the Interested Citizens. My essay is in dialogue with a characteristically insightful lecture given thirty years ago by Arthur Fine. Addressing the Philosophy of Science Association as its president, Fine argued that general philosophy of science was dead, and that all the action lay in the philosophy of the special sciences. I try to identify what was correct about Fine’s diagnosis, while supplementing his message by describing fruitful projects that have since emerged. I also hope to share his subversive spirit.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-018-0227-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,966
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Causation, Prediction, and Search.Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):113-123.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):287-297.
Progress and Its Problems.Larry Laudan - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 46 (4):623-644.
Bias and Values in Scientific Research.Torsten Wilholt - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):92-101.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Art and the Educated Audience.James O. Young - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):29-42.
Art and Audience.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):315-332.
From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature Via Philosophy of Mind: Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 28 (2):257-264.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-06

Total views
23 ( #347,652 of 2,235,936 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #367,010 of 2,235,936 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature