Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):387 - 401 (2003)
AbstractWhen we think of theories that attempt to root capitalism in nature, the one that comes most readily to mind is Social Darwinism. In this theory, nature - driven by Darwinian natural selection (the struggle for existence and the survival of the fittest) - is interpreted to imply, when applied to human activities, that extreme competition will allow the most "fit" competitors to rise to the top and to survive in this "struggle for existence," and this process of dog-eat-dog competition leads to both material and social progress. Not only has this theory been shown to be seriously flawed, the putative social implications of Darwinian natural selection do not accord with the findings of contemporary neoDarwinists who maintain, for example, that the behavior of monkeys and apes reveals a blend of competition and cooperation and, generally, a close connection to human moral behavior. Adam Smith provides a more helpful view of the connection between nature and capitalism. He maintains that nature's wisdom, as seen in its harmony and balance, is displayed in economics and human nature. Competitive free enterprise, as a vehicle for exchange, functions within a cooperative context and exhibits virtues and values such as mutual help and benefit, trust, harmony, and friendship. I shall show that neoDarwinists agree with Smith's view that nature supports a connection between competition and cooperation, and they maintain that moral activity, rather than destructive dog-eat-dog competition, is necessary to achieve the goals of natural selection.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
The Role of Spiritual Well-Being and Materialism in Determining Consumers' Ethical Beliefs: An Empirical Study with Australian Consumers. [REVIEW]Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury & Mario Fernando - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):61-79.
Unethical Behavior in Organizations: Empirical Findings That Challenge CSR and Egoism Theory.Jeffrey Overall - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (2):113-127.
Meeting Goodpaster's Challenge: A Smithian Approach to Goodpaster's Paradox.David Gray & Peter Clarke - 2005 - Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (2):119-126.
Meeting Goodpaster's Challenge: A Smithian Approach to Goodpaster's Paradox.David Gray & Peter Clarke - 2005 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 14 (2):119–126.
A Free-Market Model for Media Ethics: Adam Smith's Looking Glass.Lawrence Souder - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):53 – 64.
Similar books and articles
Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature.Larry Arnhart - 1998 - State University of New York Press.
Pt. 4. The Challenge of Deriving an Ought From an Is: Moral Acquaintances and Natural Facts in the Darwinian Age.Stephen S. Hanson - 2009 - In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer.
Virtue Ethics and the Material Values of Nature.Kari Väyrynen - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):137-148.
How Jerry Fodor Slid Down the Slippery Slope to Anti-Darwinism, and How We Can Avoid the Same Fate.Alex Rosenberg - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (1):1-17.
Nature in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics.Richard Kraut - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):199-219.
Pt. 1. Thomistic Foundations : Natural Law Theory, Synderesis and Practical Reason. Human Nature and its Limits / Christopher Tollefsen ; Synderesis, Law, and Virtue / Angela McKay ; Human Nature and Moral Goodness / Patrick Lee ; Natural Law for Teaching Ethics : An Essential Tool and Not a Seamless Web. [REVIEW]Jack Green Musselman - 2009 - In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer.