The Best Interests Standard for Incompetent or Incapacitated Persons of All Ages

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):187-196 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


When making decisions for adults who lack decision-making capacity and have no discernable preferences, widespread support exists for using the Best Interests Standard. This policy appeals to adults and is compatible with many important recommendations for persons facing end-of-life choices.Common objections to the policy are discussed as well as different meanings of this Standard identified, such as using it to express goals or ideals and to make practical decisions incorporating what reasonable persons would want. For reasons of consistency, fairness, and compassion, this standard should be used for all incapacitated persons.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,215

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Determining proxy consent.Richard O'Neil - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):389-403.
Canaries in the mines?Alasdair Maclean - 2002 - In Jonathan Seglow (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. F. Cass Publishers. pp. 164-186.
Decision Making for Incompetent Persons.Louis I. Katzner - 1986 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2):79-82.


Added to PP

66 (#183,007)

6 months
2 (#297,972)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Abandoning Informed Consent.Robert M. Veatch - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (2):5-12.
Mongolism, Parental Desires, and the Right to Life.James M. Gustafson - 1973 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 16 (4):529-557.
The Challenge of Definition.C. Everett Koop - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (1):2-3.

View all 6 references / Add more references