Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (1):45-49 (2011)
AbstractThe ‘best interests’ decision making standard is used in clinical care to make necessary health decisions for non-capacitated individuals for whom neither explicit nor inferred wishes are known. It has been also widely acknowledged as a basis for enrolling some non-capacitated adults into clinical research such as emergency, critical care, and dementia research. However, the best interests standard requires that choices provide the highest net benefit of available options, and clinical research rarely meets this criterion. In the context of modern norms of bioethics, the best interests standard rarely supports surrogate consent for research and should not be accepted as a routine provision
Similar books and articles
Turning Failures Into Successes: A Methodological Shortcoming in Empirical Research on Surrogate Accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
Best Interests in the MCA 2005—What Can Healthcare Law Learn From Family Law?Shazia Choudhry - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (3):240-251.
Ethical Decision-Making in Research: Identifying All Competing Interests: Commentary on “Six Domains of Research Ethics”.Michael Kalichman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):215-218.
What is the Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):35 – 43.
Rejecting the Baby Doe Rules and Defending a "Negative" Analysis of the Best Interests Standard.Loretta Kopelman - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):331 – 352.
Children and Health-Care Research: Best Treatment, Best Interests and Best Practice.Hazel Biggs - 2011 - Clinical Ethics 6 (1):15-19.
The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness.L. M. Kopelman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289.
U.S. Federal Regulations for Emergency Research: A Practical Guide and Commentary.Andrew McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
Trust Based Obligations of the State and Physician-Researchers to Patient-Subjects.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):542-547.
A New Standard for Incapacitated Patient Decision Making: The Clinical Standard of Surrogate Empowerment.M. Tunzi - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (4):316-330.
Contributions of Empirical Research to Medical Ethics.Robert A. Pearlman, Steven H. Miles & Robert M. Arnold - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Non-Beneficial Pediatric Research: Individual and Social Interests.Jan Piasecki, Marcin Waligora & Vilius Dranseika - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (1):103-112.
Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine.Victoria Shepherd - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):55.
The Theorisation of ‘Best Interests’ in Bioethical Accounts of Decision-Making.Giles Birchley - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-18.
Constructing Authentic Decisions: Proxy Decision Making for Research Involving Adults Who Lack Capacity to Consent.Victoria Shepherd, Mark Sheehan, Kerenza Hood, Richard Griffith & Fiona Wood - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e42-e42.
Child’s Objection to Non-Beneficial Research: Capacity and Distress Based Models.Marcin Waligora, Joanna Różyńska & Jan Piasecki - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):65-70.
References found in this work
A Critique of Clinical Equipoise: Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (3):19-28.
The Best Interests Standard for Incompetent or Incapacitated Persons of All Ages.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):187-196.
Does an Appeal to the Common Good Justify Individual Sacrifices for Genomic Research?Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn & Martien Pijnenburg - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):415-431.
Informed Consent, Exploitation and Whether It is Possible to Conduct Human Subjects Research Without Either One.Dave Wendler - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (4):310–339.