Zygon 47 (1):118-139 (2012)
Abstract. On the naive reading, “radical social constructivism” would be the result of “deconstructing” science. Science would simply be a contingent construction in accordance with social determinants. However, postmodernism does not necessarily abandon fidelity to the objects of thought. Merold Westphal's Derridean philosophy of religion emphasizes that even theology need not eliminate the transcendence of the divine other. By drawing an analogy between natural and supernatural transcendence, I argue that science is similarly called to responsibility in the encounter with that which lies outside its horizon of expectation. Science's rational autonomy is overcome by the heteronomy of realities that precede it. Understanding species as homeostatic property clusters is an example of nonessentialist, postmodern, and scientific realism. Science is still a vehicle for encountering natural alterity, thus decentering the relativism thought to characterize postmodernism. However, natural science must not attempt to place the whole of being at human disposal if it is to fulfill the potential of Westphal's philosophy of religion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann - 1966 - Anchor Books.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Overcoming Onto-Theology: Toward a Postmodern Christian Faith.Merold Westphal - 2001 - Fordham University Press.
Methodological Postmodernism: On Merold Westphal's Overcoming Onto-Theology.John D. Caputo - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):284-296.
Book Review: Merold Westphal.Transcendence and Self-Transcendence: On God and the Soul. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004. XIV and 235 Pages. Cloth 50.00. Paper50.00. Paper 22.95. [REVIEW]Patricia Altenbernd Johnson - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (2):129-132.
Transcendence in Tears.Kevin Hart - 2009 - In B. Keith Putt (ed.), Gazing Through a Prism Darkly: Reflections on Merold Westphal's Hermeneutical Epistemology. Fordham University Press.
What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism.Reed Richter - 2002 - Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
The Benefit of the Doubt : Merold Westphal's Prophetic Philosophy of Religion.B. Keith Putt - 2009 - In Gazing Through a Prism Darkly: Reflections on Merold Westphal's Hermeneutical Epistemology. Fordham University Press.
Karl Popper's Political Philosophy of Social Science.Geoff Stokes - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):56-79.
Why Science Cannot Be Value-Free.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):33-41.
Appropriating Westphal Appropriating Nietzsche : Merold Westphal as a Theological Resource.Bruce Ellis Benson - 2009 - In B. Keith Putt (ed.), Gazing Through a Prism Darkly: Reflections on Merold Westphal's Hermeneutical Epistemology. Fordham University Press.
Transcendence: Philosophy, Literature, and Theology Approach the Beyond.Regina M. Schwartz (ed.) - 2004 - Routledge.
Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Merold Westphal on the Sociopolitical Implications of Kierkegaard's Thought.C. Stephen Evans - 2009 - In B. Keith Putt (ed.), Gazing Through a Prism Darkly: Reflections on Merold Westphal's Hermeneutical Epistemology. Fordham University Press.
Added to index2012-02-27
Total downloads55 ( #96,579 of 2,178,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #54,724 of 2,178,228 )
How can I increase my downloads?