Interpretation and theory in the natural and the human sciences comments on Kuhn and Taylor

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (3):197–212 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00183.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Comments on Hugh Lacey’s “Neutrality in the Social Sciences”.Carl Graumann - 1997 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2&3):361–362.
Interpretation and theory in natural and human sciences: comments on Kuhn and Taylor.Hugh Lacey - 1997 - Trans/Form/Ação 20 (1):87-106.
Does Interpretation in Psychology Differ From Interpretation in Natural Science?Jack Martin & Jeff Sugarman - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (1):19-37.
Comments on Robert M. Farr, "the significance of the skin as a natural boundary in the sub-division of psychology.".Justin Leiber - 1997 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2&3):369–372.
Comments on the theory of structuration.Anthony Giddens - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (1):75–80.
Mutualism in the human sciences: Towards the implementation of a theory.Arthur Still & James M. M. Good - 1992 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (2):105–128.
Comments on the prospects for a nomothetic theory of social structure.Peter M. Blau - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (3):265–272.
Interpretation and verification in the human sciences: A note on Taylor.Terry Pinkard - 1976 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (2):165-173.
Which theory of behaviour for the social sciences.Raymond Boudon - 2007 - In Francesca Castellani & Josef Quitterer (eds.), Agency and Causation in the Human Sciences. Mentis Verlag. pp. 197--212.
'A epistemologia engajada de Hugh Lacey II' - Estudo crítico de 'Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding' (Hugh Lacey).Marcos Olivera - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#473,474)

6 months
4 (#1,006,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
A realist theory of science.Roy Bhaskar - 1975 - New York: Routledge.
Philosophy and the human sciences.Charles Taylor - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Explanation Of Behaviour.C. Taylor - 1964 - Humanities Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references