Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):585-587 (2017)

The overarching issue with this case study is poor regulation and quality control over direct-to-consumer genetic testing, delivered in the absence of any medical oversight.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-017-9817-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Question Not Asked: The Challenge of Pleiotropic Genetic Tests.Robert Samuel Wachbroit - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.
My Experience with Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.Sarah M. Hartz - 2015 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (3):208-210.
Personal Genomic Testing, Genetic Inheritance, and Uncertainty.Paul Mason - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):583-584.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #947,086 of 2,498,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,668 of 2,498,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes