Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):291-298 (1988)

Abstract
This paper is a reflection on two ontological analogies that have played a role in discussion about the Trinity---the Modalist and Social analogies. I argue that the Modal analogy commits one to a view of the divine persons that comports poorly with Scripture. I then consider two arguments to the effect that the doctrine of the Trinity commits one to tritheism. I argue that the Social analogy contains better resources for handling these arguments than the more traditional position, which involves denying that the divine persons are substances
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil19885327
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Material Constitution and the Trinity.Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael C. Rea - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Split Brains and the Godhead.Trenton Merricks - 2006 - In Thomas Crisp, David Vander Laan & Matthew Davidson (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 299-326.
Trinity.Dale Tuggy - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Objections to Social Trinitarianism.William Hasker - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):421 - 439.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
53 ( #196,330 of 2,439,610 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,095 of 2,439,610 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes