Feeling as the origin of value in Scheler and Mencius

Continental Philosophy Review 53 (2):141-155 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Max Scheler and Mencius both take feeling to be the origin of value and could therefore be considered to be proponents of axiological sentimentalism. Despite the great spatial and temporal distance between them, there are striking similarities between the theories of value they developed. It should be noted, however, that there are also some differences between them that are mainly derived from some difficulties with their theories of value. These difficulties should be removed so that a better theory of value could be developed. It is accordingly the aim of this paper to promote a phenomenological dialogue between Scheler and Mencius that could lead to such a better theory. In Sects. 1, 2, I will first delineate Scheler’s theory of value and feeling, then that of Mencius. In Sect. 3, I will point out some difficulties with the two theories and promote a dialogue between them that would improve each theory. In Sect. 4, I will conclude with some remarks concerning the future task of the phenomenological dialogue between Scheler and Mencius.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Emotion and Value in David Hume and Max Scheler.Marek Pyka - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 40:81-85.
Feeling and Value.Cheryl Hause Calhoun - 1981 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Wertapriori und Wertsein in der materialen Wertethik Max Schelers.Wei Zhang - 2010 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 2 (1):178-194.
On The Discussions Concerning Status Of The Value : ).Leszek Kopciuch - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 5 (2):153-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-08

Downloads
31 (#129,909)

6 months
12 (#1,086,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nam-In Lee
Seoul National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nicomachean ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - New York: Clarendon Press. Edited by Michael Pakaluk. Translated by Michael Pakaluk.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1969 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.
A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40).David Hume - 1969 - Mineola, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.
A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.

View all 26 references / Add more references