Foot and Aristotle on virtues and flourishing

Philosophia 35 (1):43-62 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article compares the views of Foot and Aristotle on virtues and flourishing. It is argued that the view put forward in Philippa Foot’s recent book, Natural Goodness, suffers from a certain sort of vagueness and it is open to other criticisms which the Aristotelian view can avoid. Foot’s views have been subjected to criticism in the recent literature by David Copp and David Sobel. These criticisms are given consideration in the article and it is argued that the more traditional Aristotelian view advocated by the author will have the means to answer some of these criticisms whereas Foot’s view will not.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dion, theon, and daup.Josh Parsons - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):85–91.
Natural goodness and natural evil.Joseph Millum - 2006 - Ratio 19 (2):199–213.
The grammar of goodness: an interview with Philippa Foot.Alex Voorhoeve - 2003 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 11:32-44.
Full Human Flourishing.Mark K. Spencer - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:193-204.
Moral dilemmas and other topics in moral philosophy.Philippa Foot - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism and the virtues.Philippa Foot - 1985 - Mind 94 (374):196-209.


Added to PP

172 (#114,133)

6 months
13 (#201,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?