In risk we trust/Editing embryos and mirroring future risks and uncertainties

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (2):191-200 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tendencies and efforts have shifted from genome description, DNA mapping, and DNA sequencing to active and profound re-programming, repairing life on genetic and molecular levels in some parts of contemporary life science research. Mirroring and materializing this atmosphere, various life engineering technologies have been used and established in many areas of life sciences in the last decades. A contemporary progressive example of one such technology is DNA editing. Novel developments related to reproductive technologies, particularly embryo editing, prenatal human life engineering, and germline engineering need to be analyzed against the broader social and structural background. The crucial analytical scope for this paper is a specific field: the life-editing technologies used in reproductive medicine and performed experimentally on viable human embryos, particularly CRISPR/cas9 technology. This text argues that germline editing technologies, as a representative part of contemporary biomedicine, are merging ideas of treatment and enhancement to avoid future risks. Using this specific life manipulation of embryos and gametes, the text analyzes these processes within the concept of power over life—biopower and the specific governing rationality that imagines, classifies, and governs contemporary societies. The text specifically focuses on the potential to create, define, and manage future risks and uncertainties related to prenatal life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

World Risk Society and Manufactured Uncertainties.Ulrich Beck - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (2):291-299.
BSE in the UK: Why the risk communication strategy failed. [REVIEW]Karsten Klint Jensen - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (4-5):405-423.
Derivatives.Jakob Arnoldi - 2004 - Theory, Culture and Society 21 (6):23-42.
Gene Editing, Enhancing and Women’s Role.Frida Simonstein - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1007-1016.
Moral and Instrumental Norms in Food Risk Communication.Peter G. Modin & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (2):313 - 324.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-20

Downloads
16 (#889,721)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

When Species Meet.Donna Jeanne Haraway - 2007 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics.Hubert L. Dreyfus & Paul Rabinow - 1982 - Chicago: Routledge. Edited by Paul Rabinow & Michel Foucault.

View all 22 references / Add more references