Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):667-685 (2011)
Two experiments were performed to explore the mechanisms of human 3D shape perception. In Experiment 1, the subjects’ performance in a shape constancy task in the presence of several cues (edges, binocular disparity, shading and texture) was tested. The results show that edges and binocular disparity, but not shading or texture, are important in 3D shape perception. Experiment 2 tested the effect of several simplicity constraints, such as symmetry and planarity on subjects’ performance in a shape constancy task. The 3D shapes were represented by edges or vertices only. The results show that performance with or without binocular disparity is at chance level, unless the 3D shape is symmetric and/or its faces are planar. In both experiments, there was a correlation between the subjects’ performance with and without binocular disparity. Our study suggests that simplicity constraints, not depth cues, play the primary role in both monocular and binocular 3D shape perception. These results are consistent with our computational model of 3D shape recovery
|Keywords||Contours Simplicity constraints Depth cues 3D shape perception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Measurement and Modeling of Depth Cue Combination: In Defense of Weak Fusion.M. S. Landy, L. T. Maloney, E. B. Johnston & M. Young - 1995 - Vision Research 35:389--412.
Reconciling Simplicity and Likelihood Principles in Perceptual Organization.Nick Chater - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):566-581.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Seeing Shape: Shape Appearances and Shape Constancy.D. J. Bennett - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):487-518.
The Perception of Shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
On the Matching of Seen and Felt Shape by Newly Sighted Subjects.John Schwenkler - 2012 - I-Perception 3 (3):186-188.
Shape Properties and Perception.Kirk A. Ludwig - 1996 - In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues. Atascadero: Ridgeview. pp. 325-350.
Perception and Action in Depth.D. P. Carey, H. Chris Dijkerman & A. David Milner - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):438-453.
To Cognize is to Categorize: Cognition is Categorization.Stevan Harnad - 2005 - In C. Lefebvre & H. Cohen (eds.), Handbook of Categorization. Elsevier.
Symmetry in Knapped Stones is Real, Not Romanced.Diane Humphrey - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):409-410.
Shape: Its Development and Regulation Capacity During Embryogenesis.J. Herkovits & J. Faber - 1978 - Acta Biotheoretica 27 (3-4):185-200.
A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain.K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis - 2005 - Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Perceived Shape at a Slant as a Function of Processing Time and Processing Load.William Epstein, Gary Hatfield & Gerard Muise - 1977 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3:473–483.
Does Perception Outstrip Our Concepts in Fineness of Grain?Kevin Connolly - 2011 - Ratio 24 (3):243-258.
Shape Properties, Experience of Shape and Shape Concepts.John Campbell - 1996 - Philosophical Issues 7:351-363.
Added to index2011-08-05
Total downloads55 ( #94,756 of 2,164,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,012 of 2,164,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?