Irresistibility, Epistemic Warrant and Religious Belief

Religious Studies 25 (4):425 - 433 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been widely argued that beliefs in general are not under direct voluntary control. It is not the case that we can by decision of the will decide what to believe or what to refrain from believing in many ordinary instances of believing. Doxastic voluntarism now seems a dubious doctrine at best, regardless of how emphatic Descartes and other traditional epistemologists seemed to be in their support of the doctrine

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Doxastic Voluntarism.Mark Boespflug & Elizabeth Jackson - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Evidentialism, "the Will to Believe," and Belief in God.Charles S. Layman - 1983 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Believing intentionally.Matthias Steup - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2673-2694.
Acceptance and deciding to believe.Andrei A. Buckareff - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Research 29:173-190.
Doxastic voluntarism.Rico Vitz - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why Every Belief is a Choice: Descartes’ Doxastic Voluntarism Reconsidered.Mark Boespflug - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 31 (2):158-178.
The Ethics of Religious Belief.Elizabeth Jackson - 2021 - Religious Studies Archives 1 (4):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
26 (#145,883)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Religious Belief.Elizabeth Jackson - 2021 - Religious Studies Archives 1 (4):1-10.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references