- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defending the Distinction Between Research and Medical Care
American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):63-66 (2006)
Abstract
No abstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Defending the distinction between treatment and enhancement.Peter H. Schwartz - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):17 – 19.
What's Trust Got to Do With It? Trust and the Importance of the Research–Care Distinction.Emily A. Largent - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):22-24.
So why does animal experimentation matter? Review of Ellen Frankel Paul and Jeffrey Paul, eds. 2001. Why animal experimentation matters: The use of animals in medical research.Nathan Nobis - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):1 – 2.
Justice, medicine, and medical care.Rosamond Rhodes - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):32 – 33.
Paul Litton and Franklin G. Miller Reply to Madeline M. Motta.Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):635-635.
Medical Education, Managed Care and the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Alan Jotkowitz - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):46-47.
A Slippery Argument: Ableism in the Debate on Medical Assistance in Dying.Rosana Triviño, Jon Rueda & David Rodríguez-Arias - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (11):99-102.
Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century.Ronald M. Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Watching the Responsibility Clock: Medical Care, Ethics, and Medical Shift Work.Mark Arnold, Ian Kerridge & Paul Komesaroff - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):22-24.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)
6 months
23 (#125,194)
2010-09-14
Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)
6 months
23 (#125,194)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The real problem with equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
Response to Commentators on “The Real Problem with Equipoise”.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):W42-W45.
References found in this work
The Ancillary‐Care Responsibilities of Medical Researchers: An Ethical Framework for Thinking about the Clinical Care that Researchers Owe Their Subjects.Henry S. Richardson & Leah Belsky - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (1):25-33.
The real problem with equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
Equipose and international human-subjects research.Alex John London - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (4):312–332.
A Normative Justification for Distinguishing the Ethics of Clinical Research from the Ethics of Medical Care.Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (Fall 2005):566-74.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo