Philosophy Compass 5 (8):676-688 (2010)
Psychopathy presents a difficult challenge to moral and criminal responsibility theorists. Persons with the disorder have an impaired capacity for empathy and other moral emotions, and fail to feel the force of moral considerations. They have some rational impairments, but they reason adequately to manipulate, con, and exploit their victims, and otherwise to engage successfully in antisocial behavior. Is it appropriate to hold them morally responsible for their wrongdoing? Should the law hold psychopaths criminally responsible? This essay discusses philosophical debates involved in addressing these questions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgments.Jesse J. Prinz - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):29-43.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Are Psychopathic Serial Killers Evil? Are They Blameworthy for What They Do?Manuel Vargas - 2010 - In Sarah Waller (ed.), Serial Killers and Philosophy. Blackwell.
Diagnosing Blame: Responsibility and the Psychopath.Carl Elliott - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):199-214.
Responsibility Status of the Psychopath: On Moral Reasoning and Rational Self-Governance.Paul Litton - 2008 - Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. No., 2008 39 (349):350-392.
Psychopathy, Responsibility, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction.David W. Shoemaker - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):99-124.
Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry, and Philosophy.Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Added to index2010-07-22
Total downloads94 ( #53,995 of 2,158,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #64,757 of 2,158,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?