Relativism and reflexivity

This paper develops a version of the self-refutation argument against relativism in the teeth of the prevailing response by relativists: that this argument begs the question against them. It is maintained that although weaker varieties of relativism are not self-refuting, strong varieties are faced by this argument with a choice between making themselves absolute (one thing is absolutely true - relativism); or reflexive (relativism is 'true for' the relativist). These positions are in direct conflict. The commonest response, Reflexive Relativism, is shown to be vulnerable to an iterated version of the self-refutation argument. As a result, Reflexive Relativism possesses only the appearance of content, being either incoherent, or a regressively disguised version of Absolute Relativism. Concluding remarks on Absolute Relativism acknowledge this to be a bare, formal possibility, but claim that in fact it must represent one of a range of weaker varieties of relativism that alone remain tenable.
Keywords Relativism  Transcendental Argument  Reflexive  Self-refutation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0967255032000108039
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,162
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Warrant: The Current Debate.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Relativism and the Possibility of Interpretation.William Newton-Smith - 1982 - In Martin Hollis & Steven Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. MIT Press. pp. 106--122.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Poverty.Robert Lockie - 2015 - Social Epistemology 30 (2):133-149.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Against Relativism. [REVIEW]Aaron Z. Zimmerman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (3):313-348.
Response to Anders Tolland's 'Iterated Non-Refutation: Robert Lockie on Relativism'.Robert Lockie - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):245 – 254.
Relativism.Maria Baghramian - 2004 - Routledge.
Why Content Relativism Does Not Imply Fact Relativism.Achim Lohmar - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):145-162.
“Is Relativism Self-Defeating?”.Harold Zellner - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
A Consistent Relativism.Steven D. Hales - 1997 - Mind 106 (421):33-52.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

78 ( #65,129 of 2,152,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #185,114 of 2,152,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums