Dissecting Bioethics

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):3-5 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many bioethical disputes are conceptual. This means that people quarrel about the use of words that they see as important. The underlying idea is that whoever wins the verbal argument will also be ethically right

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human dignity, bioethics, and human rights.Matti Hayry & Tuija Takala - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (3):225-233.
Arguments and analysis in bioethics.Matti Häyry (ed.) - 2010 - Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Euthanasia, ethics and economics.Heta Häyry & Matti Häyry - 1990 - Bioethics 4 (2):154–161.
The Right to Genetic Ignorance Confirmed.Tuija Takala - 1999 - Bioethics 13 (3-4):288-293.
Aids now.Heta Häyry & Matti Hayry - 1987 - Bioethics 1 (4):339–356.
We should not allow dissection of animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
40 (#398,309)

6 months
7 (#430,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references