Human Nature 22 (1-2):64-88 (2011)
AbstractMatriliny has long been debated by anthropologists positing either its primitive or its puzzling nature. More recently, evolutionary anthropologists have attempted to recast matriliny as an adaptive solution to modern social and ecological environments, tying together much of what was known to be associated with matriliny. This paper briefly reviews the major anthropological currents in studies of matriliny and discusses the contribution of evolutionary anthropology to this body of literature. It discusses the utility of an evolutionary framework in the context of the first independent test of Holden et al.’s 2003 model of matriliny as daughter-biased investment. It finds that historical daughter-biased transmission of land among the Mosuo is consistent with the model, whereas current income transmission is not. In both cases, resources had equivalent impacts on male and female reproduction, a result which predicts daughter-biased resource transmission given any nonzero level of paternity uncertainty. However, whereas land was transmitted traditionally to daughters, income today is invested in both sexes. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Matrilineal Inheritance: New Theory and Analysis.John Hartung - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):661-670.
Citations of this work
Cultural Consonance, Deprivation, and Psychological Responses for Niche Construction.Robert J. Quinlan - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Similar books and articles
Preferential Parental Investment in Daughters Over Sons.Lee Cronk - 1991 - Human Nature 2 (4):387-417.
Urbanization and Daughter-Biased Parental Investment in Fiji.Dawn B. Neill - 2011 - Human Nature 22 (1-2):139-155.
Does Investment in the Sexes Differ When Fathers Are Absent?Mhairi A. Gibson - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (3):263-276.
Predicting Cross-Cultural Patterns in Sex-Biased Parental Investment and Attachment.Robert J. Quinlan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):40-41.
Does Cultural Evolution Need Matriliny?Chris Knight - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):339-340.
Reproductive Strategies and Sex-Biased Investment.Susan Scott & C. J. Duncan - 1999 - Human Nature 10 (1):85-108.
Evolved Cognitive Biases and the Epistemic Status of Scientific Beliefs.Helen3 De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):411-429.
Invoking Narrative Transmission in Oral Societies.Ileana Benga - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):280-280.
Adaptive Social Learning Strategies in Temporally and Spatially Varying Environments.Wataru Nakahashi, Joe Yuichiro Wakano & Joseph Henrich - 2012 - Human Nature 23 (4):386-418.
Parental Investment Theory and Birth Sex Ratios in Nepal.S. S. Strickland & V. R. Tuffrey - 1997 - Journal of Biosocial Science 29 (3):283-295.
The Significance of Non-Vertical Transmission of Phenotype for the Evolution of Altruism.Scott Woodcock - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (2):213-234.