- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Guilty Robots, Happy Dogs: The Question of Alien Minds
Oxford University Press (2008)
Abstract
Do animals have thoughts and feelings? Could robots have minds like our own? Can we ever know, or will the answer be forever out of our reach? David McFarland explores the answers to these questions, drawing not only on the philosophy of mind, but also on developments in artificial intelligence, robots, and the science of animal behaviour.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Guilty Robots, Happy Dogs: The Question of Alien Minds: The Question of Alien Minds.David McFarland - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
David McFarland, Guilty Robots, Happy Dogs: The Question of Alien Minds.Berel Dov Lerner - 2009 - Philosophy in Review 29 (5):363.
David McFarland and Thomas bösser, intelligent behavior in animals and robots.Sunil Cherian & Wade O. Troxell - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):452-456.
David McFarland and Thomas Bösser, Intelligent Behavior in Animals and Robots. [REVIEW]David McFarland, Thomas Bosser, Sunil Cherian & Wade O. Troxell - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):452-456.
Robotic Animism: The Ethics of Attributing Minds and Personality to Robots with Artificial Intelligence.Sven Nyholm - 2022 - In Tiddy Smith (ed.), Animism and Philosophy of Religion. Springer Verlag. pp. 313-340.
Robot Autonomy vs. Human Autonomy: Social Robots, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Nature of Autonomy.Paul Formosa - 2021 - Minds and Machines 31 (4):595-616.
Of Animals, Robots and Men.Christine Tiefensee & Johannes Marx - 2015 - Historical Social Research 40:70-91.
Why Machines Can Neither Think nor Feel.Douglas C. Long - 1994 - In Dale W. Jamieson (ed.), Language, Mind and Art. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality. [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):235-241.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-06
Downloads
7 (#1,412,480)
6 months
3 (#1,045,901)
2016-02-06
Downloads
7 (#1,412,480)
6 months
3 (#1,045,901)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Feeling of Action Tendencies: On the Emotional Regulation of Goal-Directed Behavior.Robert Lowe & Tom Ziemke - 2011 - Frontiers in Psychology 2.
Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective.Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
Robotrust and Legal Responsibility.Ugo Pagallo - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):367-379.
Brain–computer interfaces and dualism: a problem of brain, mind, and body.Joseph Lee - 2016 - AI and Society 31 (1):29-40.
Homeostats for the 21st Century? Simulating Ashby Simulating the Brain.S. Franchi - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):93-101.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo