The Logical Force of Expressions

Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 15:185-195 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It seems to make perfectly good sense to distinguish between what is expressed and the way in which it is expressed. There is little doubt that there are many different ways of saying the same thing open to us. If I denied this, I would certainly be wrong. And yet a word of caution may not be amiss. Among logicians a tendency has grown up to concentrate their attention on those properties of a statement which make it true or false, what they call a “proposition”, and to neglect the form in which it is expressed. I think it is a dangerous tendency as it may lead to overlooking all sorts of differences which are due to the form. Let me give an example taken from F. P. Ramsey.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Logical Force of Expressions.Friedrich Waismann - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):7-20.
The Logical Force of Expressions.Friedrich Waismann - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):7-20.
Three Views of Theoretical Knowledge.William Demopoulos - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):177-205.
Moments as Truth Makers.Peter Simons - 1982 - In Werner Leinfellner (ed.), Language and Ontology. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky / Reidel. pp. 159-161.
'Meaning is use' in the tractatus.Paul Livingston - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (1):34–67.
Narrative, Identity and Moral Philosophy.Raimond Gaita - 2003 - Philosophical Papers 32 (3):261-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references